Very few people have this kind of complaint, so there's not much to go on. It might be possible to tweak SABnzbd internally to deal in some better way to utilize the network better, It does look like there's something odd going on in your network setup that only The other programs should be equally capable of higher speeds.
Does supernzb software#
SABnzbd isn't the fastest program on earth, but, with the exception of "Total Newserver", other Usenet software cannot saturate your line There are many factors involved, but in your case it's not simply SABnzbd itself.
Does supernzb Pc#
With my three year old dual-core Windows 7 PC I can get up to 11 MBytes/sec, enough to max out my 100Mbit/sec FTTH connection. With mediocre hardware (say Atom), SABnzbd can reach between 5-8 MBytes/sec, I figured I was missing a buffering / cache / throttle of some type. If I am expecting too much for SABnzbd to saturate the pipe itself, then I can adjust my expectations. Throughout, my cpu does not sustain over 40%. If my pipe is saturated, (LAN/WLAN, INternet, Newsserver, ISP limited, etc, etc) I would expect I would max out at about the 1.5Mb/s Starting the other programs should have had an inverse effect.If the other software was getting speed, the SABnzbd should drop dramatically. I have shut down everything I can in order to have as little as possible interfere. I disabled my VPN to remove it from the equation. SuperNZB drops to 1Mb/s SABnzbd drops to about 1.2Īll connections: no ssl, port 119, same news service, same login. I get 1.5Mb/s approx speed on 2 connections. If I cut SABnzbd to 10 connections, no change. SABnzbd, with 20 connections, downloads under 1.5Mb/s I have not put any type of trace software in place. I was trying to be explicit and my have been confusing things.įor this note, all numbers are averages based on observations. I am a newbie in relation to SABnzbd and this forum, not networking. Hopefully, this helps point to the proper solution. However, SuperNZB is showing 325 / 2.6mbs.Īs you can see, even verifying the math again (I wanted to be sure I gave you an accurate answer), I think I am missing something in my SABnzbd configuration. I cannot do the same test with SuperNZB because I am limited to two connections. This is what I had expected to see out of SABnzbd.
Does supernzb download#
I restarted NewsBin to ensure that all 18 server connections were being used.Īfter restarting the NewsBin download, I am getting 381/3048 download speed. I added the 10 connections used by SABnzbd to NewsBin. So, to test that: Fresh boot with same experience. I know I have the throughput, because the other two software programs have the same / similar speeds. In my thought process, if I get that type of download with 10 connections, 10 more would double that (at least). so, right now, if this runs correct, with only 10 connections, I am getting 1.288MB/S With overhead, I see a bit less than that, but, let's go with it. This tells me I messed up something in the SABnzbd config, but I can't figure out what. I added the other two and performed downloads without impacting SABnzbd. The poor speeds with SABnzbd were even with a clean boot and only SABnzbd running. I wanted to see if it would impact SABnzbd. Yes, I am running all three newsgroup downloading services at one time.
![does supernzb does supernzb](http://www.techsono.com/usenet/uploads/FindNZB-2-300x212.jpg)
I changed the port from 563 to 119 to 23. I originally was running through a VPN, but pulled that out. I had article cache at 128M, changed it to 512M with no effect. One note I saw, drop servers to 10 and remove ssl. I got more than that with 2 server connections. I get about 350kb on the high end when connecting with 18 connections. I am trolling the forums, but cannot figure out what I am missing.